As it relates
to speed reducers, they all have some common similarities
regardless of the application. Primarily they are
used to transmit uniform motion when coupled to a
type of motor (usually an electric motor). The transfer
of power from the motor via the speed reducer will
operate a wide variety of applications ranging from
material handling conveyors to food processing equipment
to personal mobility devices, just to name a few.
When a request for a speed reducer is made, a joint
effort between the Boston Gear sales engineering
team in conjunction with the customer’s engineering
team outline a set of specifications to determine
the proper selection of a speed reducer under a given
set of operational parameters. Mostly this is theoretical
data based on a wide variety of assumptions.
So
how do we know for sure if the reducer is properly
selected and applied?
One easy way is to collect some data directly from a representative application.
By having the user maintenance personnel take some amperage readings while
the system is running, this information can be converted into horsepower and
thusly verify that the Boston Gear speed reducer was properly selected.
To convert amperage readings
into horsepower, consider the following formula.
HP= (A x V x 1.73 x Motor PF
x Motor Efficiency) / 745.6 watts (converts watts
to HP)
Whereas:
HP= horsepower
converted from amp readings
A= amp draw
under operating conditions
V= volts used
to power the motor (typical 280, 460, 480, etc.)
1.73= 3 phase
electrical power standard
Motor Power Factor =
usually found on motor nameplate (typical ranges: .85-.95)
Motor Efficiency=
usually found on motor nameplate (typical ranges: .90-.99)
Example:
Let’s say that
our maintenance person used his “amp meter” to
test the motor while the system was running under the
typical application load conditions. He collected the
following data:
V = 460
A= 5
Motor Power Factor from motor nameplate = .93
Motor Efficiency from motor nameplate = .95
Using the formula above we determine
the following:
HP = (460 x 5 x 1.73 x .93
x .95) / 745.6 = 4.7149 or rounded to 4.7 HP
If the speed reducer selected has
a rating higher than 4.7 horsepower then we could assume that
we have a good application. To
guarantee a good application we would use the
service factor method. As an example, most material
handling conveyor OEM’s require speed reducers
to have a minimum of 1.25 service factor, and sometimes
more, based on the exact application conditions. In
using the 1.25 as a bench mark we could take the 4.7
HP as determined from our formula multiplied by 1.25.
The result will be 4.7 x 1.25 = 5.875 (rounded to 6
HP) required to meet the application demands.
If the speed reducer is rated less than this example of 6 HP then we could
anticipate premature failure. If the reducer greatly exceeds the example of
6 HP then it could be assumed the reducer is oversized for the application
and instead offer a smaller reducer thus saving the customer money provided
the change is acceptable by both parties. The golden rule is always providing
the correct sized reducer for the application. When this occurs, all parties
involved with the process are happy with the cost effective and technically
sound solution provided.
Hopefully you found this article
beneficial and will use these tools to increase success
when solving power transmission challenges within your
facility. Please email me with your comments at engineering@bostongear.com.
|